NOTS
NUWC
NURDC
NUC
|
|
1943
1967
1969
1970
|
|
To the north is the other principle organization forming SSC San Diego, the NOTS/ NUWC/NURDC/NUC organization.
|
|
The NOTS/CalTech group made a name for itself with improvement of the Navy’s Mark 13 torpedo, an anti-ship torpedo dropped from an aircraft. The group’s work with a fixed-angle launcher at Morris Dam led to a re-designed torpedo that played a substantial role in the one-sided U.S. victory in the Battle of Leyte Gulf in October 1944, as the Japanese lost three battleships, four carriers, ten cruisers, nine destroyers and 34 auxiliary ships, all at a cost of six U.S. ships. Many of the enemy ships were victims of the vastly improved Mark 13 torpedo. Following that success, the lab was charged with the responsibility for developing every new air-dropped torpedo, the Mark 32, Mark 43, Mark 44, Mark 46 (shown above left) and the Mark 50.
On the Mark 46, Pasadena engineers not only designed and developed it, but supervised production, helped introduce it to the Fleet, and maintained and upgraded it in service. Mark 46 was the Navy’s first ASW torpedo to utilize a solid-rocket-fueled, hot-gas propulsion system. At four horsepower per pound of engine weight, the Mark 46 torpedo was capable of overtaking the most elusive submarine targets known at the time. It was the first ASW torpedo capable of launch by fixed wing aircraft at speeds up to 400 knots. Perhaps almost as significant as the weapon development itself was the development process. Official press releases announcing the completion of the Mark 46 program cited as the key element of its success the Navy’s concept of industrial partnership. Combined NOTS and contractor teams were instrumental in this program, showing the way for the future SSC San Diego-industry partnerships.
The very first CalTech program for the Navy was the Mousetrap anti-submarine rocket launcher. Building from that, the NOTS organization developed the Rocket-Assisted Torpedo (RAT) and finally the Anti-Submarine Rocket (ASROC) shown above at right. NOTS proposed the weapon as an alternative to a Bureau of Ordnance (BuOrd) request to its labs in 1955 to consider the potential for launching a nuclear depth charge from ASW ships. NOTS engineers, concerned with the inflexibility of a weapon that would turn conflict suddenly nuclear, proposed a rocket-propelled weapon with a payload either of a nuclear depth charge or a conventional acoustic homing torpedo, specifically the Mark 44. BuOrd agreed with the concept of weapons flexibility, and in 1956 began funding NOTS development of ASROC.
|
|
The Center played a major role in the testing of the Navy’s three submarine-launched fleet ballistic missiles—Polaris, Poseidon and Trident. The Navy portion of the nation’s strategic deterrence program was a fleet of submarines equipped with long-range ballistic missiles, hidden in millions of cubic miles of ocean. The strategy was excellent, but execution seemed impossible—how to get a missile from a submerged submarine to the surface before its ignition engine was fired.
NOTS engineers set up the Skyhook Testing facility shown above, a “pop-up” range at San Clemente Island, to determine exactly how to do that. Test after test was conducted with redwood logs and steel cylinders filled with concrete to determine the best mechanism to get a missile out of a submarine tube, through the water column, and far enough into the air to allow engine ignition. Their testing led to substantial re-design of the missile’s shape. Success came with the first live launch of a Polaris, conducted by the Center April 4, 1960, just a few months before the first Polaris submarine, USS George Washington, was commissioned.
|
|
The weapons testing program conducted by NOTS and its predecessors relied on an obvious requirement—recovering the weapon after the test for analysis of the run-data stored on-board. Historically, for torpedoes that sank during or following testing, this meant teams of Navy divers, recompression vans, and medical personnel. In the mid-1960s, the Center developed an underwater device to perform the difficult but essential weapons recovery role. It was called the Cable-controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV), and at the time, it was the world’s first and only remotely operated vehicle. Thus, it was obvious that it should be called upon to assist in a tense operation—recovery of a lost hydrogen bomb from the floor of the Mediterranean Sea in 1966. The bomb was one of five dropped from the sky when an Air Force B-52 bomber collided with its KC-135 refueling plane. The four that dropped on the Spanish countryside were quickly recovered, but the bomb that dropped underwater used a vast array of fleet resources that, after three months, had only succeeded in dislodging it to a substantially deeper and much-less-accessible depth. CURV was called in. Operational to about 1,000 feet by its design, it was called upon to descend more than twice that distance to attach recovery lines to the bomb. It performed wonderfully, attaching three recovery lines in three dives and allowing successful recovery of the bomb.
|
|
Despite its number, CURV III, shown above at left, was about the fourth in the development line. Its history was replete with noteworthy achievements, including a 1970 recovery of a NASA payload launched during a total eclipse of the sun and lost at sea off the coast of Virginia with irreplaceable data films, and the 1976 recovery of an F-14 that rolled off the deck of the USS John F. Kennedy with a sophisticated Phoenix missile system on board. Most noteworthy was the recovery of the PISCES III manned submersible, stranded with two men aboard on the bottom of the Irish Sea at a depth of 1,375 feet. CURV III was flown to Ireland and deployed from a ship of opportunity that provided unique challenges to the launching of the vehicle. Despite significantly heavy seas, CURV III went over the side (above left) and attached a recovery line using a unique device, a toggle bolt made on board during the last few hours before the dive. The submersible and its two-man crew were recovered with only minutes of air left.
|
|
SSC San Diego has played a major role in development of undersea surveillance technology. Early Navy capabilities consisted of arrays of hydrophones of the Sound Surveillance Underwater System (SOSUS), which collected data which were transmitted to shore processing stations. NUC provided substantial improvements on SOSUS to deal with the problems of increasing ambient noise in the oceans and quieter Soviet submarines. In the early 1970s a NAVMAT and shortly thereafter NUC engineer proposed a mobile array that could temporarily replace a disabled SOSUS array or provide coverage in areas far from fixed arrays. USNS Stalwart, shown above at left, was the first ship equipped with this capability, the Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System (SURTASS). SURTASS was deployed in the early 1980s aboard a class of specially designed ships and provided long-range passive surveillance. The ships not only towed the array but also housed data-processing equipment to process signals. The ships also could relay their data to shore processing facilities via satellite communications links developed by NOSC.
The Center has done a lot of work for NAVSEA over the years, but shipbuilding was not included in the tasking. Nevertheless, a Center hydrodynamics engineer back in the early 1970s took a 1905 concept of reducing waterplane area to reduce ship motion and designed the Stable Semi-submerged Platform (SSP). To avoid the obvious problems NUC faced with no charter for ship design, Center money was used to pay for SSP and NUC got the Coast Guard shipyard in Curtis Bay, Md., to build it. Shipped to Hawaii, SSP, shown above at right, was christened Kaimalino, a Hawaiian word meaning “calm waters,” and used as a test platform. It was so stable that, at only 88 feet long with a displacement of about 200 tons, Navy and Coast Guard helicopters could land on it in relatively high seas.
|
|
NUC Technical Director Dr. Bill McLean was convinced of the value of a facility in Hawaii to provide warm water for two Center programs—manned submersibles and marine biosystems. Shortly after NOTS Pasadena and its undersea weapons work was merged with NEL’s undersea technology group in 1967 to form the Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC), Center personnel traveled to Hawaii and found an unused hangar at the Marine Corps Air Station at Kaneohe Bay and put in a bid on it. Along with a couple of acres of waterfront property, that became the Hawaii Lab, shown above left.
NUWC lasted only a short time. The obvious name “warfare center” in the era of substantial Viet Nam war protests made recruiting about as difficult as it is today. Center headquarters moved to San Diego in 1968 and in 1969 the lab became the Naval Undersea Research and Development Center (NURDC). The Center needed a fair-sized laboratory, resulting in the construction of Bldg. 1 (on the right), eventually named in honor of Dr. McLean.
There’s an interesting story about Building 1. This building was built on a site that had some buildings that were scheduled for demolition. That work was not completed in time for the scheduled groundbreaking, which surely the facilities people visualized as the calm, traditional, time-honored, gold-shovel routine. Dr. McLean wanted something more exciting— he wanted to knock down one of the buildings with a bulldozer. Nobody could talk him out of it, so he and Captain Bishop, the Center Commander, donned hard hats and sat on the bulldozer while the operator proceeded to deal with the building. Once he got up there, however, Dr. McLean insisted that he was going to drive the bulldozer. The operator demurred, but it didn’t matter. Dr. McLean sat down in the operator’s seat and began pulling various handles. The operator frantically pointed to the correct ones, while Charlie Bishop held on for dear life. The bulldozer shovel went high overhead and Dr. McLean took a big chunk out of the roof of one of the buildings. Some time during his vigorous attack on the building, metal scraping on metal spewed sparks onto some dry wood, and a fire started. The groundbreaking ceremony ended with the bulldozer shrouded in smoke and fire engine sirens wailing in the distance.
|
|
As noted, Dr. McLean was very much interested in manned submersibles. The Center had about half a dozen years of history of unmanned vehicles with CURV, but he wanted something people could ride in. MAKAKAI, shown above right, was one of those, a manned submersible whose Hawaiian name meant “Eye in the Sea.” It was a 600-foot-depth vehicle with a six-foot-diameter acrylic plastic observation sphere with room for two operators and a unique propulsion system—cycloidal thrusters—which allowed the vehicle to maneuver simultaneously in all three dimensions.
The Marine Mammal Program, which actually originated in Pt. Mugu, moved to Hawaii to provide warmer water, not for the animals, but for the people working with them who had to spend a lot of time in the water. Begun in 1960 as the Advanced Marine Biological Systems program, its first operational systems were a sea lion recovery system called Quick Find, used for recovering ASROC quality assurance rounds, and a very secret dolphin system called Short Time. That was the amount of time provided for the Center to put together a system to provide swimmer defense protection for the Army ammunition pier at Cam Ranh Bay, a favorite target of North Vietnamese swimmer sappers. A young Navy EOD lieutenant named Les Bivens took a system developed in about a year to Vietnam, and shut down the pier attacks. Les eventually was the third manager of the program, after Bill Powell and Hop Porter. Quick Find and Short Time are now, respectively, the Mark 5 and Mark 6 Marine Mammal Systems. Shown above at left is the Mark 7 system, which employs bottlenose dolphins to mark bottom mines.
|
|
In the late 1970s, pre-BRAC days, the fact that NUC and NELC headquarters were about five minutes apart did not escape Navy officials, and a decision was made to merge them. On March 1, 1977, they were joined into the Naval Ocean Systems Center.
|
|
NELC had been very interested in the shipboard spaces where command and control went on. NOSC continued to pursue that, proposing and then designing a dedicated shipboard space for the embarked battle group commander called the Tactical Flag Command Center (TFCC). TFCC took the battle group commander out of the various places he was distributed around various carriers, and provided a specific space for him and his staff to receive data, communicate and make decisions at the level above the ship’s captain. Shown above at right is a full-scale mock-up in Building 600 of the first TFCC, which was installed on USS America.
For some years in the late 1980s NOSC pursued a program to communicate with submarines via lasers deployed on aircraft. Dr. Tom Kaye was the program manager of that effort. One of his concerns was affordability of the system versus its positive effect on naval operations. The facility shown on the left, the Research, Evaluation and Systems Analysis (RESA) facility, was developed in 1989 to answer those questions. At the same time, coincidentally, the long-awaited Naval War College’s Enhanced Navy War-Gaming System was some months behind delivery schedule. NOSC jumped into the breech and employed RESA to provide war-gaming opportunities for battle group staffs prior to deployment while ENWGS was being completed.
|
|
Critical to the success of Center-developed torpedoes was the ability to accurately direct them to a target. Around 1960, the Navy put the first NOTS Mark 111 systems to sea to provide targeting data for ASROC-launched payloads. At the same time the station was modifying the Mark 111 capabilities to include other ASW weapons, resulting in the more versatile Mark 114 ASW Fire Control System. During the 1970s and 1980s the Naval Undersea Center/NOSC organization was the technical direction agent for the Mark 116 ASW Control System, shown above at left. The Mark 116 was the first surface ship ASW digital fire control system to communicate directly to a digital launcher.
One of the few shortcomings of ASROC was its launch mode. Fired from canisters at a fixed ballistic angle, ASROC could provide only limited coverage without turning the ship. With the advent of Vertical Launch Systems (VLS) on the Navy’s Spruance, Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke classes of ships, NOSC re-designed ASROC for vertical launch mode as shown above right, enabling the weapon to provide 360-degree ASW standoff capabilities for those ships, plus the high rate of fire characterizing VLS weapons. VLA continues as the only weapons program in which the Center is still engaged. Of particular significance: The ASROC capability developed by Center engineers has now been in the fleet since 1960, and it is currently planned to continue as a viable anti-submarine weapon until the year 2025.
|
|
It’s 1990 and rumors are rampant about massive consolidations/mergers/disestablishments. The Navy announces its plan to consolidate its seven R&D centers, including NOSC, and 29 engineering centers, including the NAVELEXs on both coasts, into four warfare centers, with alignment along platform lines. So in January 1992, along with the easily understood Naval Surface/Undersea and Air Warfare Centers, there’s a fourth—the Naval Command, Control and Ocean Surveillance Center (NCCOSC). NCCOSC gets about ten of the 36 organizations consolidated, and after some planning, forms three divisions—an RDT&E Division, and two in-service engineering divisions, one for each coast. The RDT&E Division, NRaD, is mostly NOSC, into which is merged within a few months the Fleet Combat Direction Systems Support Activity, the Navy Space Systems Activity and the Navigation and Air C3 Department of the Naval Air Development Center. NRaD, by the way, loses its major product lines of ASW weapons development and Arctic Submarine Warfare and, along with them, 350 positions to the Undersea Warfare Center (and some surface ship ASW Control System work to the Surface Warfare Center), under something called “mission purification.” Newport’s reasoning: We’re the Warfare Center for submarines, and Anti-submarine warfare and Arctic submarine warfare both have the word “submarine” in them, so the work must be ours. NOSC/NRaD couldn’t argue with that, but countered with the statement: We’re the C3 guys, and NADC is doing Air C3 and navigation, so that work must be ours. We prevailed, bringing in a major new product line and 250 positions to replace what we’d lost.
|
|
The West Coast engineering division, NISE West, included the NAVELEXs in San Diego and Vallejo, and the Pacific engineering activities in Pearl Harbor, Guam and Japan. These are the folks who do much of the installation of electronic equipment on the ships, and who ensure that the equipment continues performing as designed.
|

|
The new product line at NRaD was navigation. It was new to us, but not to the folks who had been doing it for decades in Warminster, Pennsylvania. They were a welcome addition to the organization, with their many years of experience as the Navy’s representative for the joint Global Positioning System. Additionally, their work included efforts on the Ocean Survey Program, which provided a seafloor terrain following capability to allow Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines to navigate in the operational areas without the requirement to surface for GPS fixes.
|
|
Going back to the World War II era, the local Vultee Aircraft Company, which eventually would become General Dynamics, produced B-24 Liberator bombers, one per hour, in three huge buildings on Pacific Highway. When completed, the bombers were taxied over a bridge to Lindbergh Field, where women pilots flew them to Air Force bases around the world for the men pilots to fly into combat. In 1994, through some skilled negotiations with the Air Force, NCCOSC took over ownership of those manufacturing buildings, which already housed substantial portions of NISE West. The buildings provided capabilities for NISE West to fabricate radar antennas, communications vans, and other hardware essential to NCCOSC’s C4ISR functions. In the final chapter of this installment of the Center’s history, NISE West was merged into NRaD in 1996, resulting in today’s SSC San Diego tasking of RDT&E, engineering and fleet support in C4ISR.
|
|
One last thing: The key to our success, which was the theme of our 60th anniversary ceremony in mid-June, 2000, is our people. The first photo, taken at that ceremony, is of our former Commanders/Commanding Officers/Technical Directors/Executive Directors.
|
|
And the second is a photo showing some of our technical and administrative people. These folks, representing all Center employees, are the principal ingredient that has made this organization great. Missing from the photos, but certainly not forgotten, are the third essential element of our people—our industry partners.
|
|